<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Super() Explained</title>
	<atom:link href="http://simplistika.com/super-explained/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/</link>
	<description>Think Simple</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:55:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JC</title>
		<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-692</link>
		<dc:creator>JC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:31:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jared.simplistika.com/?p=218#comment-692</guid>
		<description>I think I understand this tutorial. I&#039;m essentially BRAND NEW to actionscript and it indeed was simple. Question though - once you press ctrl+enter is something supposed to happen to let you know that it&#039;s working right? Thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I understand this tutorial. I&#8217;m essentially BRAND NEW to actionscript and it indeed was simple. Question though &#8211; once you press ctrl+enter is something supposed to happen to let you know that it&#8217;s working right? Thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rbrill</title>
		<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-667</link>
		<dc:creator>rbrill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 09:34:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jared.simplistika.com/?p=218#comment-667</guid>
		<description>A great little tutorial, why can&#039;t they all be like this? Usually they get so complex you end up getting lost altogether. A nice straightforward, simple explanantion of super()</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A great little tutorial, why can&#8217;t they all be like this? Usually they get so complex you end up getting lost altogether. A nice straightforward, simple explanantion of super()</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-222</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 11:55:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jared.simplistika.com/?p=218#comment-222</guid>
		<description>Nice and clean... thank you very very much...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice and clean&#8230; thank you very very much&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jared</title>
		<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-221</link>
		<dc:creator>jared</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:32:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jared.simplistika.com/?p=218#comment-221</guid>
		<description>Well you call your parent class when you want to access a particular method in your parent class. For example if your parent class has a generic function plays an exported sound in the library, you can call the parent with super.playSound(&quot;Sound.mp3&quot;), and so in future projects you simply have to extend to your &quot;generic&quot; parent class so you don&#039;t have to re-code again. Mostly it&#039;s wanting to keep your code clean and organized for reusability; thats pretty much what object oriented is about: reusability. Not sure if what I say makes sense but I do know where you&#039;re coming from and all I can say is keep going and soon you&#039;ll be explaining it to someone else!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well you call your parent class when you want to access a particular method in your parent class. For example if your parent class has a generic function plays an exported sound in the library, you can call the parent with super.playSound(&#8220;Sound.mp3&#8243;), and so in future projects you simply have to extend to your &#8220;generic&#8221; parent class so you don&#8217;t have to re-code again. Mostly it&#8217;s wanting to keep your code clean and organized for reusability; thats pretty much what object oriented is about: reusability. Not sure if what I say makes sense but I do know where you&#8217;re coming from and all I can say is keep going and soon you&#8217;ll be explaining it to someone else!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Walmik</title>
		<link>http://simplistika.com/super-explained/comment-page-1/#comment-220</link>
		<dc:creator>Walmik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 16:23:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://jared.simplistika.com/?p=218#comment-220</guid>
		<description>Hi this is indeed a Simplistik explanation and thank you very much for it. Though if you dont mind i d like to know, what is th reason of calling the parent function if we are already extending it?

Many thanks in advance</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi this is indeed a Simplistik explanation and thank you very much for it. Though if you dont mind i d like to know, what is th reason of calling the parent function if we are already extending it?</p>
<p>Many thanks in advance</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
